Cases 171 - 180 of 18,929
RAZA v. TAYLOR
as 1:2024cv00354
Petitioner:
SAJID RAZA
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NEIMEISTER v. THE COUNTY OF SALEM et al
as 1:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NEIMEISTER, ROBERT STRAUSS, III, MATTHEW BRANGAN and others
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF SALEM, WARDEN JOHN S. CUZZUPE, JOHN S. CUZZUPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FERMAN v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
EVIN FERMAN
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, CAPTAIN DILLIE and SGT. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LENTZ v. DILL et al
as 3:2024cv01133
Plaintiff:
TREY LENTZ
Defendant:
RYAN DILL and LOUIS DEDONNO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIZK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv02745
Petitioner:
WISAM RIZK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ELM v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
FRED ELM
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON and C. PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SUASTI v. ESSEX COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv02548
Plaintiff:
FLEIX PLUAS SUASTI
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY, ESSEX COUNTY OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOBLE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv02324
Petitioner:
WILLIAM H. NOBLE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CAMMARATA v. DONNELLY et al
as 3:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CAMMARATA
Defendant:
JOHN V. DONNELLY, III, CHAD F. KENNEY, DAVID J. IGNALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOLER v. CCCF
as 1:2024cv02335
Plaintiff:
LUIS O. SOLER
Defendant:
CCCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
