Cases 171 - 180 of 53,120
Moncrief v. Lafayette City Police, et al
as 6:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Damien Rashad Moncrief
Defendant:
Todd Reid, Tyier Mitcham, Angerer Holden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melancon et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 6:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Gerald Melancon and Rebecca Melancon
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Abby Lafayette L L C v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co
as 6:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Abby Lafayette, LLC
Defendant:
Hartford Fire Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
USA v Whiteman et al
as 5:2024cv00502
Not Yet Classified:
Robin M Whiteman
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Brian K Whiteman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001 Federal Debt Collection Act
McCray v. Wade
as 3:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
John McCray
Defendant:
Tyler Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hargrave et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA L L C
as 6:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hargrave and Natalie Deshotels Hargrave
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Mercedes-Benz U S A L L C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Foreman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Ryan Foreman
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
