Cases 11 - 20 of 188
Ruggles v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv02024
Plaintiff:
Christine Alice Ruggles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Rafferty v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv02218
Plaintiff:
Alice Rafferty
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00779
Plaintiff:
Alice M Sullivan and Alice Sullivan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Sutton Cannon et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01842
Plaintiff:
Alice Sutton Cannon and Allen Cannon
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Montini v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01544
Plaintiff:
Alice Montini
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoyle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05944
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alice Hoyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels v. Ohio State University Physicians, Inc.
as 2:2020cv05859
Plaintiff:
Alice Daniels
Defendant:
Ohio State University Physicians, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
