Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Oliver
as 1:2018mc00158
Defendant:
Gary E. Oliver
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Oliver v. Nielson et al
as 1:2016cv00155
Plaintiff:
D. Bruce Oliver
Defendant:
Larry G. Nielson , Todd Richardson , Brent E. Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Aequitas Management et al
as 2:2016mc00328
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Aequitas Management, Aequitas Holdings, Aequitas Commercial Finance and others
Receiver:
Ronald Greenspan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Krstevski et al v. Welsh et al
as 1:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
Kire Krstevski , Rebecca Phillips , Samantha Wilson and others
Defendant:
Edward B. Welsh, Stacy Welsh, Terry Goers and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Oliver v. American Pension Services et al
as 2:2014cv00487
Plaintiff:
Darlene Oliver
Defendant:
American Pension Services and Curtis L. DeYoung
Receiver:
Diane A. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Xyngular v. Innutra Arizona et al
as 2:2013cv00685
Plaintiff:
Xyngular
Defendant:
Innutra Arizona , Innutra California , James Ayres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hayes et al v. Chevron Pipe Line Company
as 2:2012cv00287
Plaintiff:
Peter Hayes , Thi-Ly Downing-Hays , George Eugene Barton and others
Defendant:
Chevron Pipe Line Company and PacifiCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
