Cases 11 - 20 of 34
RAMSEY v. FAUST et al
as 1:2012cv01818
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD RAMSEY
Respondent:
THOMAS N. FAUST and EDWARD F. REILLY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
MALONE v. CLINTON et al
as 1:2012cv00431
Plaintiff:
JOAN FRANCES MARY MALONE
Defendant:
HILLARY R. CLINTON, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, GEORGE BUSH, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMSEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011cv02277
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID RAMSEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
RAMSEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011cv01710
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID RAMSEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
RAMSEY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2010cv02020
Plaintiff:
GLENDA J. RAMSEY , KATRINA C. MITCHELL , DENETRA FRANCIS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
MALONE v. BUSH et al
as 1:2010cv01902
Plaintiff:
JOAN FRANCES M. MALONE
Defendant:
GEORGE BUSH, SR., GEORGE W. BUSH, RICHARD CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
CHANG et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2002cv02010
Plaintiff:
RAYMING CHANG , AMY CHASTAIN , YOUNG CHOI and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and others
Cross_claimant:
FAIRFAX COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cross_defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
