Cases 11 - 20 of 36
HICKS v. USA
as 1:2018cv00119
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ANDRE HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PINSON et al v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2017mc00338
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PINSON, MARQUIS HICKS, TIMOTHY LYNN BECKWITH and others
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
SMITH et al v. FRONTLINE COMMUNITY SERVICES, INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
ANDRE SMITH , MARCIA ADAMS , OMWA COOPER and others
Defendant:
FRONTLINE COMMUNITY SERVICES, INCORPORATED , DITTU ABRAHAM , JEAN SAMUEL and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HICKS v. USA
as 1:2016cv01802
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ERIC A. HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
HICKS v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
as 1:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
ERIC A. HICKS
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
HARBISON v. U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS et al
as 1:2011cv01828
Petitioner:
PAUL RENFRO HARBISON, JR.
Respondent:
U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, U.S. HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BOLAND et al v. HICKS MASONRY COMPANY, LLC
as 1:2011cv01783
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOLAND , HENRY KRAMER , KEN LAMBERT and others
Defendant:
HICKS MASONRY COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
