Cases 11 - 20 of 29
RCC Associate Inc v. Eclat Roofing Inc et al
as 5:2018cv01188
Defendant:
Samuel Bolanos, Eclat Roofing Inc, Richard Wells and others
Plaintiff:
RCC Associate Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hooks v. Bethany Police Department et al
as 5:2017cv00658
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dewayne Hooks
Defendant:
Bethany Police Department, Oklahoma County Jail, Armor Correctional Health Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooks v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv00414
Plaintiff:
Reginald Paul Hooks
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hooks v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hooks
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Roland Village Apartments et al
as 6:2014cv00476
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Roland Village Apartments, Bob Beaty, Alta Beaty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hooks v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2012cv00426
Plaintiff:
Johnny Andre Hooks
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Frederick v. Sunoco, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
Tracy Denise Frederick
Defendant:
Sunoco Pipeline, L.P. , Edward Tyrone Hooks, Jr and Sunoco Pipeline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corrections Corporation of America 401k Savings and Retirement Plan v. Carkin et al
as 5:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
Corrections Corporation of America 401k Savings and Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Norma M Carkin, Carla Rogers and Jerald T Hooks, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gaines-Hooks v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00001
Plaintiff:
Alvina Gaines-Hooks
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hooks v. Oklahoma State of
as 6:2011cv00249
Petitioner:
Marcus Durell Hooks
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
