Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Jenkins v. Myrick
as 2:2018cv00100
Petitioner:
Michael W Jenkins
Respondent:
John Myrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Kelly
as 6:2017cv01300
Petitioner:
Charles Jenkins
Respondent:
Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trumble v. Klamath Falls City Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv00502
Defendant:
Daniel Banderas, Isa Daibes, Lt. Jack Daniel and others
Plaintiff:
Michael John Trumble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
as 2:2017cv00375
Respondent:
Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Petitioner:
Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Ellis et al
as 3:2017cv00169
Defendant:
Judge James R. Ellis and Multnomah County
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Amsberry
as 2:2016cv02314
Respondent:
Brigitte Amsberry
Petitioner:
Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Beatty et al
as 3:2016cv02274
Defendant:
Judge C. Beatty and Judge Mercedes F. Diez
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacific Northwest Regional Council of Carpenters et al v. Kelaye Concrete LLC
as 3:2016cv02242
Plaintiff:
Bill Jenkins and Pacific Northwest Regional Council of Carpenters
Defendant:
Kelaye Concrete LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Jenkins v. Myrick
as 2:2016cv01534
Petitioner:
Michael W. Jenkins
Unknown:
Lisa Hay and Lynn David Larsen
Respondent:
John Myrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Myrick
as 2:2016cv01402
Petitioner:
Michael W. Jenkins
Respondent:
John Myrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
