Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Smith v. Samuel et al
as 3:2012cv00524
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Smith
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuel, Jr., FCI Allenwood, FCI Elkton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alvarez v. Kranzel
as 3:2012cv00493
Petitioner:
Reuben A Alvarez, Jr.
Respondent:
D.B. Kranzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stanley v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Darnell Stanley
Defendant:
United States Of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, David W. Ogden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Azzara v. Stroda et al
as 3:2011cv01737
Plaintiff:
Paul Azzara
Defendant:
Frank Stroda, R Martinez, Julie Ann Nicklin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ceasar v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2009cv00862
Petitioner:
Maurice Ceasar
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Schuylkill, R. A. Kranzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CEASAR v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2009cv00818
Petitioner:
Maurice Ceasar
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Olowasegun Obebe, Kathy Souverain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CEASAR v.OBEBE, et al.
as 4:2009cv00798
Plaintiff:
Maurice Ceasar
Defendant:
DC Department of Corrections, Federal Bureau of Prisons Northeastern Region, R. A. Kranzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CEASAR v.OBEBE, et al.
as 1:2009cv00609
Plaintiff:
MAURICE CEASAR
Defendant:
DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE, R. A. KRANZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CEASAR v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2009cv00603
Petitioner:
MAURICE CEASAR
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OLUWASEGUN OBEBE, KATHY SOUVERAIN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
