Cases 11 - 20 of 26
RAVEN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv05861
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
RON RAVEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLL v. IM PRACTICES, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv12586
Defendant:
SAURABH AGARWAL, IM PRACTICES, INC. and IM PRACTICES, INC. doing business as JOMSON STAFFING SERVICES & RAVEN LOGISTICS
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. COLL, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12273
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GREEN v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv03680
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RAVEN GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv11597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv11281
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv09502
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
SINCLAIR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv13699
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Plaintiff:
RAVEN LYNN SINCLAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE et al v. TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD et al
as 2:2017cv07743
Plaintiff:
FRANCES MOORE and RAVEN MOORE
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD , ESSEX COUNTY and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
