Cases 11 - 20 of 49
D.A.M., et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-5281
Plaintiff / Appellant:
A.R.G.., a minor, J.S.M., L.O.R. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and William Pelham Barr, Attorney General of the United States of America
McGuire v. A.R.M. Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2020cv03933
Defendant:
A.R.M. Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carolyn McGuire
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2020cv03929
Defendant:
A.R.M. Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carolyn McGuire
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2020cv03932
Defendant:
A.R.M. Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carolyn McGuire and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2020cv03930
Defendant:
A.R.M. Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carolyn McGuire and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McGuire v. A.R.M. Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2020cv03931
Defendant:
A.R.M. Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carolyn McGuire
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
M.M.V., et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-5106
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Davidson, Acting USCIS Asylum Division Chief, William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Mark A. Morgan, Acting Commissioner, United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
L.O.R., J.C.P., a minor, E.A.N., a minor and others
M.M.V., et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-5129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
E.M.R., L.O.R., J.C.P., a minor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Davidson, Acting USCIS Asylum Division Chief, William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, James McHenry, Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03516
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
