Cases 11 - 20 of 2,198
GERACE et al v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv62734
Plaintiff:
GLADYS GERACE
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Garnishee:
CAREY CANADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZIELENSKI et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63201
Plaintiff:
THEODORE ZIELENSKI and ROSE ZIELENSKI
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROWE v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv62750
Plaintiff:
FAYE ROWE
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VERDERAME et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63207
Plaintiff:
ANDREW VERDERAME and ELAINE VERDERAME
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SARRA et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63199
Plaintiff:
JOHN SARRA and ELSIE SARRA
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIACALONE et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63250
Plaintiff:
FRANK GIACALONE and VICTORIA GIACALONE
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STRUWAS et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63194
Plaintiff:
DONALD STRUWAS and ALICE STRUWAS
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COULOMBE v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63190
Plaintiff:
LUCIEN COULOMBE
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMMOND v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68746
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE HAMMOND
Defendant:
A C & S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOLEY v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68747
Plaintiff:
ROY K. FOLEY
Defendant:
A C & S INC , A P GREEN REFRACTORIES , A W CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
