Cases 1 - 10 of 2,198
In Re: Asbestos Prod Liab Lit
as 12-2527
Plaintiff - Numerous Parties See Appellant:
ALM MAURITZ, ANVIK NORMAN, BORIAUG WILLARD and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORTH DAKOTA PIPEFITTER II GROUP PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
A.P.I., INC., A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD IND, A DELAWARE CORPORATION SUCCESSOR ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY SUCCESSOR KEASBEY & MATTISON COMPANY, ASBESTOS PROD MFG and others
REILLY v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv62785
Plaintiff:
HOWARD REILLY
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., CELOTEX CORPORATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSSI et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63213
Plaintiff:
ALDEN ROSSI and JANE ROSSI
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONNELLY et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63251
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CONNELLY, SR. and ANNE CONNELLY
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REESE et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63200
Plaintiff:
ROBERT REESE and JOAN REESE
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEBLANC et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63208
Plaintiff:
NORMAN LEBLANC and MARIE ALINE LEBLANC
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROY et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63198
Plaintiff:
JEAN-PAUL ROY and GABRIELLE ROY
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONERINO et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63197
Plaintiff:
PHILIP CONERINO and JEANNETTE CONERINO
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUPUIS et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63202
Plaintiff:
FRANCOIS DUPUIS and BARBARA DUPUIS
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAPEN et al v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
as 2:2011cv63203
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CAPEN and MARILYN CAPEN
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
