Cases 11 - 20 of 6,281
WOODLEY et al v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv83234
Plaintiff:
HARRELL L. WOODLEY and MAXINE WOODLEY
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION , ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP. , ASTEN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPRUILL et al v. ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83231
Plaintiff:
HENRY W. SPRUILL and MARY D. SPRUILL
Defendant:
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP. , ASTEN, INC. , BRANDON SALES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83230
Plaintiff:
ROBERT O. SMITH and JANIS A. SMITH
Defendant:
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP. , ASTEN, INC. , BRANDON SALES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LADNER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86335
Defendant:
BECHTEL INC. doing business as BECHTEL INC. OF NEVADA also known as C & I GIRDLER COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BECHTEL, INC., ETC., OAKFABCO, INC., IMO INDUSTRIES and others
Plaintiff:
LLOYD J. LADNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCRANEY v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86348
Defendant:
AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC., BECHTEL CORPORATION, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK MCCRANEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GISSENDANNER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86306
Defendant:
CRANE COMPANY, D.B. RILEY, INC., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MAMIE GISSENDANNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOLLISON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86297
Defendant:
3M, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
JUANITA DOLLISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FENNEN v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86301
Defendant:
GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, CRANE COMPANY, JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS JOSEPH FENNEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CANNON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86395
Defendant:
3M, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., VIACOM, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHIQUITA CANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
