Cases 11 - 16 of 16
AL-AYSSAMI et al v. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC et al
as 1:2012cv01178
Plaintiff:
MAZIN AL-AYSSAMI and SHIBLI AL-AYSSAMI
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC, STATE MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SERVICE, ALI MUMLUK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
LATIF v. OBAMA
as 1:2011cv02294
Petitioner:
ADNAN FARHAN ABDUL LATIF
Respondent:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EMERGENCY COALITION TO DEFEND EDUCATIONAL TRAVEL ("ECDET") et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 1:2006cv01215
Plaintiff:
EMERGENCY COALITION TO DEFEND EDUCATIONAL TRAVEL, EMERGENCY COALITION TO DEFEND EDUCATIONAL TRAVEL, WAYNE S. SMITH and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, UNITED STATES TREASURY OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, HENRY M. PAULSON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
JABBAROV et al vs. BUSH et al
as 1:2005cv02386
Plaintiff:
OMAR (LNU), SHARAF AL SANANI, FAHD AL HARAAZI and others
Petitioner:
ABDULLAH LNU, NADIR OMAR ADULLAH BIN SAADOUN ALSAARY, AMER MOHAMMON and others
Respondent:
MIKE BUMGARNER, GEORGE WALKER BUSH, JAY HOOD and others
Amicus Curiae:
MUSLIM ADVOCATES, DUE PROCESS SCHOLARS and CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ABDAH et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2004cv01254
Petitioner:
MAHMOAD ABDAH AHMED, MAJID MAHMOUD AHMED, MAHMOAD ABDAH and others
Respondent:
GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES B. GITTINGS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ANAM et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2004cv01194
Petitioner:
BISHER NASER ALI ALMARWALH, MASAAB OMAR AL-MADHWANI, ABDULKHALIQ AL-BAIDHANI and others
Respondent:
GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES B. GITTINGS, JR., MUSLIM ADVOCATES, DUE PROCESS SCHOLARS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
