Cases 11 - 20 of 153
Tutankhaman v. Schumer
as 2:2022cv01682
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
Amy Schumer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Villarreal v. Correa et al
as 2:2022cv00815
Plaintiff:
Amy Villarreal
Defendant:
Jorge Correa and City of North Las Vegas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tahoe Cabin, LLC et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 3:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Tahizzle, LLC and Trustee Patrick Willis
Defendant:
Tahoe Cabin, LLC, Federal Highway Administration, Division Director Amy S Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Repo
Brown v. Amie et al
as 3:2021cv00489
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Brown
Defendant:
Melba Amie and Michael Amie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Dotty's Station Casino et al
as 2:2021cv02012
Plaintiff:
Warren Phillips
Defendant:
Dotty's Station Casino, Latesha Jean Hunter, Amy LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns et al v. Clark County School District, Board of Education et al
as 2:2021cv01725
Plaintiff:
Brandon Burns, Wendy Price, Sharelle Mendenhall and others
Defendant:
Clark County School District, Board of Education, Dr. Jesus F. Jara, Linda P. Cavazos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Durand v. Coffee
as 3:2021cv00233
Plaintiff:
Roberto Durand
Defendant:
Amy A. Coffee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dahl v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00921
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Amy Elizabeth Dahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00761
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
