Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Hernandez v. Berrio et al
as 1:2017cv00299
Defendant:
Luis Berrio, Artemio Vega, Larry Maraj and others
Plaintiff:
Lionel Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bal v. ITEX Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv06794
Plaintiff:
John Andries Bal, Jr.
Defendant:
ITEX Corporation , Steven White, John Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Felix et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv02941
Plaintiff:
Maurosol Felix , Danilo Melendez , Abraham Collins and others
Defendant:
City of New York , Raymond W. Kelly , Russell J. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeLollis et al v. Draper et al
as 2:2010cv04340
Plaintiff:
John DeLollis, Todd Helfrich, Aaron Hilger and others
Defendant:
Michael Draper, Ben Glenn, Douglas McCarron and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
D'Aurizio et al v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America et al
as 1:2010cv00418
Plaintiff:
Louis D'Aurizio , Christoper V. Shakarjian and Douglas A. Janese
Defendant:
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Douglas J. McCarron, Douglas J. Banes and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Local 210 Health and Insurance Fund et al v. Guild Platers, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv07189
Plaintiff:
Local 210 Health and Insurance Fund, Local 210 Pension Fund, Local 210 Scholarship and Education Fund and others
Defendant:
Guild Platers, Inc. and Robert Andris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Upsala College et al v. Abdullah et al
as 1:2007mc00015
Debtor:
Upsala College
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Forman
Defendant:
Hasan Abdullah, Jamillah K. Adams, Deriphonse Amida and others
Upsala College et al v. Abdullah et al
as 1:2007mc00023
Debtor:
Upsala College
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Forman
Defendant:
Hasan Abdullah, Jamillah K. Adams, Deriphonse Amida and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
