Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Hartley-Culp v. Apothaker & Associates, P.C.
as 3:2014cv00362
Plaintiff:
Dawn Hartley-Culp
Defendant:
Apothaker & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
TIMLIN v. LVNV FUNDING, LLC. et al
as 2:2013cv06940
Plaintiff:
JERRY TIMLIN
Defendant:
LVNV FUNDING, LLC. and APOTHAKER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BONNELL v. APOTHAKER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
as 2:2013cv02913
Plaintiff:
KENNETH P. BONNELL
Defendant:
APOTHAKER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CROSSLAND v. APOTHAKER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. et al
as 2:2013cv00749
Plaintiff:
BARBARA CROSSLAND
Defendant:
APOTHAKER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. and PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GORDEN v. CAVALLARO et al
as 2:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH GORDEN
Defendant:
BENJAMIN J. CAVALLARO , JORDAN W. FELZER, DAVID APOTHAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
VICKERS v. APOTHAKER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. et al
as 2:2012cv06173
Plaintiff:
DOLORES VICKERS
Defendant:
APOTHAKER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. and PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
