Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2011cv80704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv61212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Royal Food & Petrolium, Inc. et al v. Secretary of State of the United States et al
as 6:2008cv01962
Plaintiff:
Royal Food & Petrolium, Inc. and Md Kabir Hossain
Defendant:
Secretary of State of the United States, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice and Consul General, U.S. Embassy, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bryant et al v. Attorney General, Department of Justice et al
as 6:2008cv01615
Plaintiff:
Amal Bryant and William Bryant
Defendant:
Attorney General, Department of Justice, Acting Field Office Director, Orlando, Florida, Director, USCIS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Yu v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 0:2008cv60829
Plaintiff:
Jian Xin Yu
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney General Department of Justice, Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Siminou v. Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 6:2007cv01726
Plaintiff:
Siamak David Siminou
Defendant:
Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Officer in Charge, Citizenship and Immigration Services, Orlando Florida, Director, USCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Thortensen v. Attorney General, Department of Justice et al
as 6:2007cv01537
Plaintiff:
Igor Thortensen
Defendant:
Attorney General, Department of Justice, District Director, USCIS Northern District, Tampa, Florida, Director, USCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
