Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Martin v. Thompson et al
as 1:2017cv00476
Plaintiff:
Tekeema Toccara Martin
Defendant:
Jason B. Thompson, Keri Matson, Abdullah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv00478
Plaintiff:
Tekeema Toccara Martin
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Coker, Caretha Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00466
Plaintiff:
Tekeema Toccara Martin
Defendant:
Johnson, Anderson, Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Unknown
as 3:2016cv00191
Petitioner:
Tekeema Martin and Zoie Paris Martin
Respondent:
Unknown
Defendant:
Fayette County Jail, Jason B. Thompson and Gwinnett County Defacs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company v. Thompson et al
as 1:2016cv01291
Plaintiff:
First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company
Defendant:
Larry B. Thompson , Mary A. Thompson , Highland Plaza, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Thompson v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00895
Plaintiff:
Carole B. Thompson
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2011cv04556
Plaintiff:
Dwight B. Thompson
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon , CWABS Asset-Backed Certificates Trust 2006-6 and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Thompson
as 1:2010cv01064
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Larry B. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. REF Development, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00727
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
REF Development, Inc. and Larry B. Thompson
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Elite Dwellings, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00530
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company and Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Elite Dwellings, LLC and Larry B. Thompson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
