Cases 11 - 20 of 48
STEVENS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv03122
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, CASTRO and WELLPATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURGOS RESTO v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
JOSE RICARDO BURGOS RESTO
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELLPATH and DR. IBRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01395
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS, JOSE RICARDO BURGOS RESTO, HECTOR TOLENTINO and others
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELL PATH, DR. IBRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPINNER v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
JULIUS SPINNER
Defendant:
DIRECTOR BECKY SCOTT, DIRECTOR OF NURSES MAXIM CASAS, NURSE WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GORDON et al v. CASAS et al
as 2:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH GORDON, JULIUS SPINNER and DARRYLU STEWART
Defendant:
MAXIM CASAS and BECKY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN et al v. HUDSON COUNTY NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2024cv03948
Plaintiff:
TORELL BROWN and NAIM ALLEN
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY NEW JERSEY, BECKY SCOTT and MAXIM CASAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILLAGRAN v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv04123
Petitioner:
JEREMY VILLAGRAN
Respondent:
BECKY SCOTT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LAZOS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LAZOS
Defendant:
DIRECTOR BECKY SCOTT and DIRECTOR OF NURSES MAXIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv03935
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RIVERA
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and DR. IBRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FERMAN v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
EVIN FERMAN
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, CAPTAIN DILLIE and SGT. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
