Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Bernard White v. Derral Adam
as 09-56961
Petitioner - Appellant:
BERNARD ANDREW WHITE
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden
Bernard Andrew White v. Darreal G. Adams
as 2:2009cv07390
Petitioner:
Bernard Andrew White
Respondent:
Darreal G. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernard White, et al v. Derral Adam
as 09-72521
Petitioner:
BERNARD ANDREW WHITE
Respondent:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden
Bernard Andrew White v. Derral G. Adams et al
as 2:2009cv02197
Petitioner:
Bernard Andrew White
Respondent:
Derral G. Adams and United States District Court Central District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernard Andrew White v. Derral G. Adams
as 2:2009cv01814
Petitioner:
Bernard Andrew White
Respondent:
Derral G. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernard Andrew White v. Derral G. Adams
as 2:2009cv01811
Petitioner:
Bernard Andrew White
Respondent:
Derral G. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernard Andrew White v. Derral G. Adams
as 2:2009cv01744
Petitioner:
Bernard Andrew White
Respondent:
Derral G. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernard Andrew White v. The United States Magistrated Judge Andrew J. Wistrich et al
as 2:2008cv05452
Plaintiff:
Bernard Andrew White
Defendant:
The United States Magistrated Judge Andrew J. Wistrich, W. Sullivan and The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
White v. Hollows
as 2:2008cv01789
Plaintiff:
Bernard Andrew White
Defendant:
Gregory G Hollows
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bernard Andrew White v. Thomas R. White et al
as 2:2008cv05098
Plaintiff:
Bernard Andrew White
Defendant:
Thomas R. White and Thomas R. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
