Cases 11 - 20 of 52
In Re: Petrobras Securities
as 18-2276
Plaintiff:
Aura Capital Ltd., Dimensional Emerging Markets Value Fund, DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc., on behalf of its series Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited, Peter Kaltman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Union Asset Management Holding AG and others
Appellant:
Mathis B. Bishop, Catherine O. Bishop, Joseph Gielata and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras, Jose Sergio Gabrielli, Silvio Sinedino Pinheiro and others
Defendant:
Mariangela Mointeiro Tizatto, Josue Christiano Gome Da Silva, Daniel Lima De Oliveira and others
Objector - Appellant:
Spencer Bueno
In Re: Petrobras Securities
as 18-2270
Plaintiff:
Aura Capital Ltd., Dimensional Emerging Markets Value Fund, DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc., on behalf of its series Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited, Peter Kaltman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Union Asset Management Holding AG and others
Appellant:
Mathis B. Bishop, Catherine O. Bishop, Joseph Gielata and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras, Jose Sergio Gabrielli, Silvio Sinedino Pinheiro and others
Defendant:
Mariangela Mointeiro Tizatto, Josue Christiano Gome Da Silva, Daniel Lima De Oliveira and others
Objector:
Spencer Bueno
In Re: Petrobras Securities
as 18-2120
Plaintiff:
Aura Capital Ltd., Dimensional Emerging Markets Value Fund, DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc., on behalf of its series Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited, Peter Kaltman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Union Asset Management Holding AG and others
Appellant:
Pomerantz LLP
Defendant - Appellee:
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras, Jose Sergio Gabrielli, Silvio Sinedino Pinheiro and others
Defendant:
Mariangela Mointeiro Tizatto, Josue Christiano Gome Da Silva, Daniel Lima De Oliveira and others
Appellee:
William Thomas Haynes, as trustee for the benefit of W. Thomas and Katherine Haynes Irrevocable Trust for the benefit of Sara L. Haynes
Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Spencer Bueno, Joseph Gielata, Richard Gielata and others
Board of Regents of the University of Texas System v. Idexx Laboratories
as 4:2018cv00786
Plaintiff:
Board of Regents of the University of Texas System
Defendant:
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
The Board of Regents of the University of Texas System v. Reynolds
as 1:2018cv00182
Defendant:
Terry Cardell Reynolds
Plaintiff:
The Board of Regents of the University of Texas System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
The Board of Regents of the University of Texas System v. Reynolds
as 1:2017cv00985
Defendant:
Terry Cardell Reynolds
Plaintiff:
The Board of Regents of the University of Texas System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
The Board of Regents of The University of Texas System v. NantHealth, Inc. f/k/a Nant Health, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv03155
Plaintiff:
The Board of Regents of The University of Texas System
Defendant:
NantHealth, Inc. f/k/a Nant Health, LLC , NantWorks, LLC , Nant Holdings IP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Board of Regents of The University of Texas System v. Stand4lyme Foundation
as 4:2016cv03023
Plaintiff:
The Board of Regents of The University of Texas System
Defendant:
Stand4lyme Foundation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
The Board of Regents of The University of Texas System v. Pelotonia, LLC
as 4:2016cv02982
Plaintiff:
The Board of Regents of The University of Texas System
Defendant:
Pelotonia, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
