Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Abegunde v. Bradshaw
as 2:2018cv02318
Petitioner:
Olufolajimi Abegunde
Respondent:
AW Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tino Y Tino v. Bradshaw et al
as 2:2018cv02288
Petitioner:
Juan Tino Y Tino
Respondent:
AW Bradshaw, Core Logic/West TN Detention, U.S. Immigration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ajgui v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 2:2018cv02276
Petitioner:
Gabriel Hernandez Ajgui
Respondent:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, AW Bradshaw and Core Logic/West TN Detention
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bradshaw v. Gross
as 2:2018cv02266
Petitioner:
Ashley Bradshaw
Respondent:
Gloria Gross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ibrahim v. Bradshaw
as 2:2018cv02246
Petitioner:
Siraj Ibrahim
Respondent:
AW Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bradshaw v. Principal Financial Group d/b/a Principal Life Insurance Company
as 2:2017cv02174
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bradshaw
Defendant:
Principal Financial Group d/b/a Principal Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Bradshaw v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2015cv02688
Plaintiff:
Leilani Bradshaw
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Miscellaneou:
Edward L. Stanton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Moffitt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv01115
Plaintiff:
Johnny Moffitt
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moffitt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv01067
Plaintiff:
Johnny Moffitt
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hairston v. Schofield et al
as 1:2015cv01054
Plaintiff:
James Hairston
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodard, Alicia Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
