Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Beaulieu Group LLC v. Mohawk Ind
as 4:2015cv00124
Plaintiff:
Beaulieu Group LLC
Defendant:
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Beaulieu Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Beaulieu Group, LLC v. Johnson
as 4:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
Beaulieu Group, LLC
Defendant:
Charles S. Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SP Acquisition Corp. v. Beaulieu Group, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv04536
Plaintiff:
SP Acquisition Corp.
Defendant:
Beaulieu Group, LLC and Advanced Medical Pricing Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Beaulieu Group, LLC v. Lucas
as 4:2010cv00234
Plaintiff:
Beaulieu Group, LLC
Defendant:
Kenneth G. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beaulieu Group, LLC v. Marett
as 1:2009cv02826
Plaintiff:
Beaulieu Group, LLC and Beaulieu Group, LLC
Defendant:
John T. Marett and John T. Marett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type:
Other Statutes
Beaulieu Group, LLC v. Smith et al
as 4:2009mi00003
Petitioner:
Beaulieu Group, LLC and Beaulieu Group, LLC
Respondent:
Johnny Lamar Smith and William J. Percy
Cause Of Action: FRCP 37(a) Motion to compel deposition testimony
Type:
Torts - Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Type:
Civil Rights
Beaulieu Group, LLC v. Unitex International, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00080
Plaintiff:
Beaulieu Group, LLC and Beaulieu Group, LLC
Defendant:
Unitex International, Inc., Unitex International, Inc., Michael H. Frain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
