Cases filed in New York
Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Islami v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 1:2024cv00967
Plaintiff: Catip Islami
Defendant: Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire The Americas, LLC, Compagnie Generale Des Establissements Michelin SCA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Slayman v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 1:2024cv01930
Plaintiff: Steven Slayman
Defendant: Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire The Americas, LLC, Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Alford v. Bridgestone Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01038
Plaintiff: James Alford
Defendant: Bridgestone Corporation, Bridgestone Americas, Inc., Continental Aktiengesellschaft and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Torres v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 1:2024cv01124
Plaintiff: Marco A. Torres
Defendant: Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire The Americas, LLC, Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Edwards v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 1:2024cv01092
Plaintiff: Michele Edwards
Defendant: Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire The Americas, LLC, Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Sampayan v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 1:2024cv00881
Plaintiff: Rena Sampayan
Defendant: Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire The Americas, LLC, Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Accor Management US Inc. et al v. Visa Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04616
Plaintiff: Warner Bros. Home Entertainment Inc., Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., Accor Hotels & Resorts (Maryland) LLC and others
Defendant: Mastercard Incorporated, Visa International Service Association, Mastercard International Incorporated and others
Special Master: James Orenstein
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Skyway Logistics Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02952
Plaintiff: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant: Skyway Logistics Corporation, Ashli Gregory, Darrell Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 jd Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract Insurance
In Re: Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Foreign Exchange Transactions Litigation
as 1:2012md02335
Defendant: Arthur Certosimo, Michael J. Kowalski, Samuel C. Scott, III and others
Plaintiff: Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, Lisa Parker, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Retirement Plan and others
Claimant: Bridgestone Americas, Inc., Bechtel Corporation, SYNNEX Corporation and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, United States Of America and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Bart Florence, Paul Bensi, Jerry Kalmer and others
Petitioner: Union Asset Management Holding AG, Ironworkers Locals 40, 361 & 417 - Union Security Funds, DeKalb County Pension Fund and others
Interested Party: David Nichols
Nominal Defendant: The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Not Classified By Court: Non-Party June Kim
Lead Plaintiff: State of Oregon By and Through the Oregon State Treasurer on Behalf of the Common School Fund and, Together with the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Board, on Behalf of the Oregon Public Employee Re
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07903
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?