Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Womack v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 2:2007cv02791
Petitioner:
Edward Womack
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Pearson
as 2:2007cv02780
Petitioner:
Gary L. Smith
Respondent:
Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2007cv02646
Petitioner:
Newton O. Bey
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gipson v. Pearson
as 2:2007cv02647
Petitioner:
Michael Gipson
Respondent:
Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2007cv02424
Plaintiff:
Newton Bey
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Bruce Pearson, Dion E. Franklund and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pachinger v. United States of America et al
as 2:2007cv02325
Petitioner:
Kenneth John Pachinger
Respondent:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dingler v. Pearson
as 2:2007cv02301
Petitioner:
Greg Dingler
Respondent:
Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maxwell v. Pearson et al
as 2:2007cv02148
Petitioner:
Patrick Maxwell
Respondent:
Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCoy v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2007cv02170
Petitioner:
Michael McCoy
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Boggs v. Pearson
as 2:2007cv02079
Petitioner:
William Boggs
Respondent:
Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
