Cases 11 - 20 of 24
PICOZZI v. MCKEOWN et al
as 2:2018cv02532
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PICOZZI
Defendant:
WILLIAM MCKEOWN, BRENDIN GREER, GARY MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PICOZZI v. TOMAS et al
as 2:2018cv02324
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PICOZZI
Defendant:
STEVE TOMAS, C. DARNELL JONES, II, CYNTHIA M. RUFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: J. C.
as 18-1142
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: J. C., individually and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent:
NICHOLAS FORD, STEFFEN BOYD, JOSETTE SPRINGER and others
Nominal Respondent:
C. DARNELL JONES, II
In re: Kevino Graham
as 17-1098
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: KEVINO W. GRAHAM
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
C. DARNELL JONES, II
In re: Jamahl Simmon
as 16-4099
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: JAMAHL SIMMONS, aka MAL
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
C. DARNELL JONES, II
In re: Gerald Bush
as 16-3803
Petitioner:
In re: GERALD BUSH
Respondent:
MERCY HOSPITAL, et al and CTT COMMUNITY TREATMENT TEAM
Nominal Respondent:
C. DARNELL JONES, II
In re: Gerald Bush
as 16-3353
Petitioner:
In re: GERALD BUSH
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, COMMISSIONER RONITTA BENTON, COMMISSIONER CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Nominal Respondent:
C. DARNELL JONES, II
In re: Donald Jone
as 15-3969
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: DONALD JONES
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
PETRESE B. TUCKER and C. DARNELL JONES, II
In re: Cornelius Badger, Jr.
as 15-1617
Petitioner:
In re: CORNELIUS A. BADGER, JR.
Respondent:
QUINTON KENNEDY, ZIKIYYAH JACKSON, DONALD THOMAS and others
Nominal Respondent:
C. DARNELL JONES, II
In re: Gerald Bush
as 14-4040
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: GERALD BUSH
Defendant - Respondent:
CRAIG B. SOKOLOW, Esquire, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Nominal Respondent:
C. DARNELL JONES, II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
