Cases 11 - 20 of 20
HIGHTOWER v. LANIGAN et al
as 1:2010cv03151
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HIGHTOWER
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, CHARLES ALBINO, RICHARD ZIMMERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLOCKER v. BELLUSCI et al
as 1:2010cv01216
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
J. BELLUSCI, M. REGGERIO, CHARLES ALBINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY et al v. ALBINO et al
as 1:2010cv00886
Plaintiff:
DERRICK GARY, WILLIAM BOND and MIKE MCKINNEY
Defendant:
CHARLES ALBINO, CHARLES WARREN, DERK LOURY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CIPOLLA v. GEORGE W. HAYMAN et al
as 1:2010cv00889
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CIPOLLA
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HAYMAN, GEORGE ROBINSON, RONALD RIGGINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARZUQ v. ALBINO et al
as 1:2009cv03933
Plaintiff:
FARID MARZUQ
Defendant:
CHARLES ALBINO, WARREN LOURY and GEORGE W. HAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIRKLAND v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2009cv02969
Petitioner:
MANDEL KIRKLAND
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMISSIONER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBLES v. ALBINO et al
as 1:2009cv02759
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROBLES
Defendant:
CHARLES ALBINO and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NIBLACK v. ALBINO et al
as 1:2009cv00428
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L. NIBLACK
Defendant:
CHARLES ALBINO, GEORGE HAYMAN, JON CORZINE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RICHARDSON et al v. ALBINO et al
as 1:2008cv02905
Plaintiff:
ALY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
CHARLES ALBINO, MICHAEL ELLIOTT, GEORGE HAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PRALL v. ALBINO et al
as 1:2007cv03798
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. PRALL
Defendant:
CHARLES ALBINO, GREG BARTKOWSKI, ATKISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
