Cases 11 - 20 of 112
Lyndon's LLC v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 23-1895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNDON'S LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, WAYNE COUNTY, MI, ERIC R. SABREE and others
HRT Enterprises v. City of Detroit, MI
as 23-1855
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HRT ENTERPRISES
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI
HRT Enterprises v. City of Detroit, MI
as 23-1847
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HRT ENTERPRISES
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Latausha Simmons v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 23-1724
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATAUSHA SIMMONS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, MI, SOUTHFIELD, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE CHIEF JOSEPH E. THOMAS, JR. and others
Timothy Hall v. Blake Navarre, et al
as 23-1711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
BLAKE NAVARRE, CO'VOSIEE COWAN, TIMOTHY BARR and others
Darrell Richmond v. Michael Mosley, et al
as 23-1643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL RICHMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER MICHAEL MOSLEY, in his Individual and Representative Capacity and CITY OF DETROIT, MI, a Municipal entity
Clifton Smith v. Cty of Detroit, MI, et al
as 23-1448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLIFTON SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, JOHN DOE 1, Warden, in his individual and representative capacity, JOHN DOE 2, in his individual and representative capacity and others
Renard Austin, et al v. Michael Mosley, et al
as 23-1425
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENARD MONTEZ AUSTIN and URSULA COOK
Defendant:
MICHAEL MOSLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Kristal Scott v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 23-1407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KRISTAL SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRIDGETT LAMAR and others
Derrick Cain v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 23-1219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK D. CAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DENNIS CHRISTIE, JANE GILLIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
