Cases 11 - 20 of 116
McManus v. The Clorox Company
as 4:2023cv05325
Plaintiff:
James McManus
Defendant:
The Clorox Company and The Employee Benefits Committee of The Clorox Company 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
THE CLOROX COMPANY v. SSARM INCORPORATED et al
as 3:2023cv04122
Plaintiff:
THE CLOROX COMPANY
Defendant:
SSARM INCORPORATED, JADE TRADING CORPORATION a New Jersey entity doing business as WARBIES DEALS, MACBY S. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
THE CLOROX COMPANY v. SSARM INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2023cv04122
Plaintiff:
THE CLOROX COMPANY
Defendant:
SSARM INCORPORATED, JADE TRADING CORPORATION dba WARBIES DEALS, MACBY S. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
M. et al v. The Clorox Company Group Insurance Plan
as 1:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Bernadette M., Kenneth M. and A. M.
Defendant:
The Clorox Company Group Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Peterson v. The Glad Products Company et al
as 3:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Patrick Peterson
Defendant:
The Glad Products Company and The Clorox Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Kossel v. The Clorox Company
as 7:2022cv10450
Plaintiff:
Olivia Kossel
Defendant:
The Clorox Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 df Diversity-Contract Default
Charles v. The Clorox Company
as 4:2022cv06855
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles
Defendant:
The Clorox Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Swetz v. The Clorox Company
as 7:2022cv09374
Plaintiff:
Bryan Swetz
Defendant:
The Clorox Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Scandore v. The Clorox Company
as 2:2022cv06545
Plaintiff:
Charles Scandore
Defendant:
The Clorox Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Craw v. The Clorox Company
as 2:2022cv02225
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Craw
Defendant:
The Clorox Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
