Cases 11 - 20 of 12,089
Kellyman v. Fairway Independent Mortgage Co.
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jamar O. Kellyman
Defendant:
Fairway Independent Mortgage Co. Its agents Its Attorney(s) of record, et al doing business as Homefinity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MURPHY v. GOLDRING GULF DISTRIBUTING CO LLC
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN MURPHY
Defendant:
GOLDRING GULF DISTRIBUTING CO. LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Johnson v. Prudential Insurance Co of America
as 1:2024cv21299
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Co of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
R.P.M. Diesel Engine Co. v. M/Y "Cyra" et al
as 0:2024cv60889
Plaintiff:
R.P.M. Diesel Engine Co.
Defendant:
MY CYRA and Luis Bolanos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Council et al v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner et al
as 3:2024cv00534
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Bank of America Co
Claimant:
LUCINDA COUNCIL, RAVYNNE GILMORE, VERNA MAITLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60876
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
R.P.M. Diesel Engine Co. v. M/Y "Cyra" et al
as 1:2024cv21992
Plaintiff:
R.P.M. Diesel Engine Co.
Defendant:
M/Y "Cyra" and Luis Bolanos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
HENRY v. ANNAPOLIS VALLEY PEAT MOSS CO. LTD.
as 9:2024cv80661
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HENRY
Defendant:
ANNAPOLIS VALLEY PEAT MOSS CO. LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
