Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Read et al v. Corning Incorporated et al
as 6:2018cv06131
Plaintiff:
John Read , Thomas R. McGrew, Jr. , Suzanne Annunziata and others
Defendant:
Corning Incorporated, Corning Homes, Inc. and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv06277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DSM Desotech, Inc et al v. Corning Incorporated
as 1:2015mc00113
Plaintiff:
DSM Desotech, Inc and DSM I.P. Assets B.V.
Defendant:
Corning Incorporated
Movant:
Hampford Research Inc
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Quash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv06667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv06704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Corning Incorporated v. Detroit Diesel Corporation et al
as 6:2011cv06530
Plaintiff:
Corning Incorporated
Defendant:
Detroit Diesel Corporation and Daimler Trucks North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corning Incorporated v. Freight Revenue Recovery of Miami, Inc.
as 6:2011cv06377
Plaintiff:
Corning Incorporated
Defendant:
Freight Revenue Recovery of Miami, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boettner v. Corning Incorporated
as 6:2011cv06282
Plaintiff:
Judy Boettner
Defendant:
Corning Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
State of New York et al v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. et al
as 1:2009cv00033
Plaintiff:
State of New York, State of New York, County of Steuben and others
Defendant:
Ingersoll-Rand Co., Corning Incorporated, Kraft Foods Global, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Corning Incorporated v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2008cv10091
Plaintiff:
Corning Incorporated
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
