Cases 11 - 20 of 175
Toms v. Kolitwenzew
as 2:2022cv02130
Plaintiff:
Andrew Toms
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center and Chad Kolitwenzew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 2:2022cv02114
Plaintiff:
Frako Ware
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew, . Juergens, Michael Downey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulwiley v. Kolitwenzew
as 2:2022cv02113
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Fulwiley
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Kolitwenzew
as 2:2022cv02088
Petitioner:
James Gregory Wallace and John Patrick Gallo, Jr
Respondent:
Chad Kolitwenzew
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv02082
Plaintiff:
Dexstin Bryant
Defendant:
. Smith, Chad Kolitwenzew and Jerome Combs Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Szpila v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 2:2022cv02077
Plaintiff:
Rhyian Szpila
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew and Jerome Combs Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Szpila v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 2:2022cv02076
Plaintiff:
Rhyian Szpila
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew and Jerome Combs Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Szpila v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 2:2022cv02078
Plaintiff:
Rhyian Szpila
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew and Jerome Combs Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sampson v. Downey et al
as 2:2022cv02070
Plaintiff:
Donald Horace Sampson
Defendant:
Michael Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew, Robert Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brown v. Haggart
as 2:2022cv02054
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Brown
Defendant:
Shannon Haggart and Chad Kolitwenzew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
