Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Third_party_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Third_party_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
YAU v. HE CHENG RESTAURANT CORP. et al
as 2:2012cv06754
Plaintiff:
CHI-MING YAU
Defendant:
HE CHENG RESTAURANT CORP. , JOHN DOE and JANE DOE I TO X
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
TRAN et al v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP. et al
as 3:2012cv04757
Plaintiff:
YEN TRAN and CHI THANH TRINH
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP., GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC, HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY v. ALPHA PSI CHI, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv02318
Plaintiff:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
ALPHA PSI CHI, INC. and THE ESTATE OF FLORIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NIKE USA, INC. v. W.W. SPORTING GOODS CO., INC. et al
as 3:2010cv06119
Plaintiff:
NIKE USA, INC.
Defendant:
W.W. SPORTING GOODS CO., INC. and CHI YUNG WANG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOLIS v. LUI
as 1:2010cv03270
Plaintiff:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant:
CHI-NGOK LUI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
LUCKY GREEN BAMBOO AND SUPPLY, INC. v. SUMMIT PLANTS AND FLOWERS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv04207
Plaintiff:
LUCKY GREEN BAMBOO AND SUPPLY, INC.
Defendant:
SUMMIT PLANTS AND FLOWERS, INC., MILLSTONE VALLEY HOLDINGS, INC., JD HSIEH & SON, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
