Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv61093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv21832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
City of Deerfield Beach, Florida v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Brit Syndicate #2987
as 0:2015cv62536
Plaintiff:
City of Deerfield Beach, Florida
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Brit Syndicate #2987
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lexra, Inc., et al v. City of Deerfield Beach, Flori
as 15-10686
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEXRA, INC., d.b.a. El Reventon, JSPC, INC., d.b.a. Dr. Philgoods, PORTHOLE PUB, INC., d.b.a. Porthole and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH, FLORIDA, a Florida Municipal Corporation
Lexra, Inc., et al v. City of Deerfield Beach, Flori
as 13-14047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEXRA, INC., d.b.a. El Reventon, PORTHOLE PUB, INC., JSPC, INC., d.b.a. Dr. Philgoods and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH, FLORIDA, a Florida municipal corporation
Badilo v. City of Deerfield Beach
as 0:2013cv60057
Plaintiff:
Lola Badilo
Defendant:
City of Deerfield Beach
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Vaughns v. Noland et al
as 0:2013cv60026
Plaintiff:
Tj Guesstyn Vaughns
Defendant:
Peggy Noland and City of Deerfield Beach, Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
LEXRA, INC. et al v. City of Deerfield Beach, Florida
as 0:2012cv61928
Plaintiff:
LEXRA, INC. , Porthole Pub, Inc. , JSPC, INC. and others
Defendant:
City of Deerfield Beach, Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv62399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
