Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Scott v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 3:2016cv00535
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Scott
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and J. Santiago Riveria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. LAWSON et al
as 4:2016cv00263
Plaintiff:
GERRARD D JONES
Defendant:
C L HODGSON, JEFFREY T BEASLEY, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Jones et al
as 3:2016cv00485
Plaintiff:
Fernando D. Garcia Garcia
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Tony Anderson, C. Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wegrzyn v. Mascara et al
as 2:2015cv14404
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Wegrzyn
Defendant:
Ken J. Mascara , Tighe , Sorovec and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
SWINSON v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES INC
as 3:2015cv00487
Plaintiff:
EDDIE L SWINSON
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Judd et al
as 8:2015cv02382
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Patterson
Defendant:
Grady Judd and Corizon Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wegrzyn v. Mascara et al
as 2:2015cv14299
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Wegrzyn
Defendant:
Ken J. Mascara, Mr. Tighe, Mr. Sorovec and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Werdell v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00353
Plaintiff:
Edward Kenneth Werdell
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, L. Melendez, D. Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Werdell v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00175
Plaintiff:
Edward Kenneth Werdell
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, L. Melendez, Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 3:2014cv01311
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ross
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Warden, Union Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
