Cases 11 - 20 of 2,014
P.C. v. D Fort Hotel, LLC.
as 1:2024cv01584
Plaintiff:
P.C.
Defendant:
D FORT HOTEL, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gormley (PS) v. Khanzada et al
as 1:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Gormley and Kathleen Mary Gormley
Defendant:
Abdul Khanzada, Brittany Khanzada, Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 a Title II Civil Rights Act 1964
Hackborn (PS) v. Stine
as 1:2024cv01514
Plaintiff:
Dean D. Hackborn, Dean D Hackborn and Dean Hackborn
Defendant:
Stine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dillon Companies, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01490
Plaintiff:
Margaret Williams
Defendant:
Dillon Companies, LLC f/k/a Dillon Companies, Inc. d/b/a King Soopers and The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP v. J&C Corp
as 1:2024cv01466
Plaintiff:
BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP d/b/a HBI International
Defendant:
J&C Corp. d/b/a Juicy Concentrates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Crosby (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01435
Petitioner:
Gregory D Crosby and Gregory D Cosby
Respondent:
A. Ciolli and M. Banuelos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pacheco et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Company
as 1:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
Yvonne S. Pacheco and Donald D. Pacheco
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
