Cases 11 - 20 of 22
TOZOUR ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. v. PATTERSON et al
as 2:2011cv07889
Plaintiff:
TOZOUR ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
RONALD D. PATTERSON and AEROPLATE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
PATTERSON v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57324
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. PATTERSON
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PATTERSON v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54632
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. PATTERSON
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PATTERSON v. KEYSTONE SHIPPING CO.
as 2:2011cv58555
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. PATTERSON
Defendant:
KEYSTONE SHIPPING CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PATTERSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43129
Plaintiff:
JANICE D. PATTERSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PATTERSON et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv65616
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. PATTERSON and ZELA PATTERSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , ACANDS, INC. , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATTERSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72150
Plaintiff:
JANICE D. PATTERSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATTERSON v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2010cv50405
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. PATTERSON
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PATTERSON v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv00479
Plaintiff:
BARRY D. PATTERSON
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, HARTFORD LIFE, INC. and THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PATTERSON et al
as 2:2008cv00827
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HOLLY D. PATTERSON and DARRIN R. PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
