Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Neal Caplinger v. CCA, et al
as 14-35190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEAL WAYNE CAPLINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, TIMOTHY WENGLER, THOMAS KESSLER and others
Wahl v. Agler et al
as 1:2013cv00376
Plaintiff:
Chad Wahl
Defendant:
David Agler and CCA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGiboney v. CCA Western Properties, Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00214
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee McGiboney
Defendant:
CCA Western Properties, Inc, David Agler, Acel Thacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brink v. CCA Western Properties, Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
Donald Shane Brink
Defendant:
CCA Western Properties, Inc, David Agler, Brian J McGourty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. IDOC et al
as 1:2012cv00580
Plaintiff:
Richard M Caldwell
Defendant:
IDOC, ICC, CCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faught v. CCA et al
as 1:2012cv00574
Plaintiff:
Gene Allen Faught
Defendant:
CCA, Bryce Aitken and David Agler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. Corrections Corporation of America, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00571
Plaintiff:
Charles T Shepherd
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, LLC, Todd J Mullinger, David Agler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caplinger v. CCA et al
as 1:2012cv00537
Plaintiff:
Neal Wayne Caplinger
Defendant:
CCA, Tim Wengler, Thomas Kessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loftis v. Wengler et al
as 1:2012cv00359
Plaintiff:
Kirk A Loftis
Defendant:
Tim Wengler, Thomas Kessler, Joseph Cardona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gisel v. Agler et al
as 1:2012cv00360
Plaintiff:
Dan Morris Gisel
Defendant:
David Agler, Acel K Thacker and Idaho Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
