Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LaMonte v. Beavex, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03158
Plaintiff:
Peter LaMonte, Peter LaMonte, Peter LaMonte and others
Defendant:
Beavex, Inc., Beavex, Inc., Beavex, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Beavex, Inc., Beavex, Inc., Beavex, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Peter LaMonte, Peter LaMonte, Peter LaMonte and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Pierson et al v. Zuber et al
as 1:2009cv00946
Plaintiff:
Marie Pierson, Deborah Summers and Robert Morrison
Defendant:
Gordon Zuber, Gordon Zuber, Gordon Zuber and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
D's Pet Supplies, Inc. v. Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00517
Plaintiff:
D's Pet Supplies, Inc.
Defendant:
Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc., Arkansas Best Corp., ABF Freight Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Matthews v. Wyeth, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00247
Plaintiff:
Betty Matthews
Defendant:
Wyeth, Inc., Wyeth, Inc., Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Brian Barnard's Flooring America, Inc. v. Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02364
Plaintiff:
Brian Barnard's Flooring America, Inc., Brian Barnard's Flooring America, Inc., Brian Barnard's Flooring America, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc., AAA Cooper Transportation, Averitt Express, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
