Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Young v. Holman
as 3:2014cv01014
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Defendant:
Marcia A. Holman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. California Correctional Health Care Services, Office of Third Level Appeals Health Care et al
as 3:2014cv01011
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Defendant:
California Correctional Health Care Services, Office of Third Level Appeals Health Care, L. D. Zamora, Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. California Corrections Prisons Organization Association
as 3:2014cv01012
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Defendant:
California Corrections Prisons Organization Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Unnamed Secretary
as 3:2014cv01013
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Defendant:
Unnamed Secretary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Pennwell et al
as 3:2014cv01010
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Defendant:
Sandra Pennwell, Amy Miller, David Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Rowland Young v. The United States of America
as 2:2014cv01528
Defendant:
The United States of America
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Murphy et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
as 5:2012cv06228
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Murphy , Richard D'Alessio , Chan C Pharn and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., World Savings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
David R. Young v. Toure Muhammad et al
as 2:2012cv07989
Defendant:
Captain S. Gonzales, Toure Muhammad and Sergeant T. Wheeler
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
David Rowland Young v. Toure Muhammad et al
as 5:2012cv01176
Defendant:
K. Chambers, Sergeant Dowler, Fletcher and others
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Young v. Muhammad et al
as 3:2012cv01700
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Defendant:
Toure Muhammad, T. Wheeler, K. Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
