Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Matiushchenko v. Madsen et al
as 1:2023cv16997
Plaintiff:
Olga Matiushchenko
Defendant:
Director Kenneth Madsen, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv16577
Plaintiff:
Haqiqurahman Rahmani
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, UR M JADDOU, Acting District Dir. Mark HANSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv16576
Plaintiff:
UR M JADDOU, Acting District Dir. Mark HANSEN, MERRICK B GARLAND and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rahmani v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv16578
Plaintiff:
Haqiqurahman Rahmani
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Mark Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Barry v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2023cv15910
Plaintiff:
Idrissa Barry
Defendant:
UR M JADDOU, Director KENNETH MADSEN, Acting Affirmative S Maria Trakas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12845
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
