Cases 11 - 20 of 11,153
CHAMBERS v. NICOLAS et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
KEION NATHANIEL CHAMBERS
Defendant:
C NICOLAS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CADEJUSTE v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
MARCO THONY CADEJUSTE
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, Z CULPEPPER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montanez v. Gagosian et al
as 5:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Mario Montanez
Defendant:
Steve Gagosian, Troy Stpiette and John/Jane Doe
Sheffield v. Doe et al
as 8:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Defendant:
John Doe, John or Jane Doe, Sgt. Brittney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Rasier (FL), LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01131
Plaintiff:
jane doe
Defendant:
Rasier (FL), LLC, Rasier, LLC, Rasier-DC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Simpkins v. Wissinger et al
as 5:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
FNU Wissinger, FNU McCatherian, Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLESKE v. CHILDS et al
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WALLESKE
Defendant:
LARRY CHILDS, RONTERRIOUS WILLIAMS, JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. Doe et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Pierre Terron Watson
Defendant:
John Doe, S. Jones, A. Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jasniak v. Arnette et al
as 3:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jasniak
Defendant:
Aaron Arnette, Trevor Milleson, Robert Kirchner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vega v. Paramore et al
as 5:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Waiter H. Paramore, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
