Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
In Re: Rosenberg, Esq.
as 1:2014mc00359
Respondent:
Donald B. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: Disciplinary Proceedings
Kastle et al v. The Town of Kent, New York et al
as 7:2013cv02256
Plaintiff:
Barbara B. Kastle and Matthew L. Kastle
Defendant:
The Town of Kent, New York, Vincent E. Bade, Chris Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estrada v. Meyer et al
as 1:2012cv00481
Defendant:
Elrac Inc., Donald B. Frazer, Gelco Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Abel Estrada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Doe v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Donald B. Smith , Putnam County Sheriff's Department and County of Putnam
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Doe v. Smith et al
as 7:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Donald B. Smith, Putnam County Sheriff's Department and County of Putnam
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv06286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Anderson et al v. Eastman Kodak Company et al
as 6:2009cv06106
Plaintiff:
Sally P. Anderson, Sally P. Anderson, Sally P. Anderson and others
Defendant:
Eastman Kodak Company, Kodak Retirement Income Plan and Kodak Retirement Income Plan Committee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodriguez v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 1:2009cv01934
Plaintiff:
Ermelinda Rodriguez
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company, John S. Chen, Lloyd H. Dean and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
