Cases 11 - 20 of 762
DURHAM v. MONICOLLO et al
as 3:2024cv03937
Plaintiff:
DYSHUN DURHAM
Defendant:
OFFICER MONICOLLO and DR. HASHMI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv03935
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RIVERA
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and DR. IBRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. PRADHANANG
as 2:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
DAVID SANCHEZ
Defendant:
DR. LILIBETH PRADHANANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. POLYGUARD GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01241
Plaintiff:
GREGORY L. JONES
Defendant:
POLYGUARD GROUP, LLC, POLY-TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LTD., JERRY GASKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BURGOS RESTO v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
JOSE RICARDO BURGOS RESTO
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELLPATH and DR. IBRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01395
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS, JOSE RICARDO BURGOS RESTO, HECTOR TOLENTINO and others
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELL PATH, DR. IBRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. KUHN ESQ. et al
as 2:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
HAKEEM ALLEN
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VEGA v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
FIDEL VEGA
Defendant:
RACHEL THOMPSON, PRADIP PATEL, M.D., JEFFERY WILK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIM v. FORT LEE DENTAL GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
DR. JI YOON KIM
Defendant:
FORT LEE DENTAL GROUP, LLC and DR. GAHWA LEE
EAGLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. et al
as 2:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
EAGLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
