Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00350
Plaintiff:
Martha E. Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 6:2017cv06846
Plaintiff:
Kim E. Williams
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zapata et al v. HSBC Holdings plc, a United Kingdom corporation et al
as 1:2017cv06645
Plaintiff:
Magdalena Avila, Reuben Redelfs, Robert Cason and others
Defendant:
Institucion de Banca Grupo Financier HSBC Mexico S.A.,, HSBC Bank USA N.A., HSBC Holdings plc, a United Kingdom corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Staples v. Deyo et al
as 9:2017cv00703
Plaintiff:
Rahson Staples
Defendant:
D. Deyo, Joe Patane, Mark D. Kinderman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeder v. Koenigsmann et al
as 9:2016cv01129
Plaintiff:
Raszell Reeder
Defendant:
Carl J. Koenigsmann, Michael Hogan, Ann Marie T. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv02121
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Kelvin E. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McCollough v. Hale et al
as 1:2016cv01783
Plaintiff:
Michael McCollough
Defendant:
Mark J. Hale, Louis Scarcella, John Doe(s) 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05674
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Williams v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00821
Plaintiff:
Martha E. Williams
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
