Cases 11 - 20 of 110
CLAYTON v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, SIKES, TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STARKS v. WHITE et al
as 3:2022cv00058
Petitioner:
JOSEPH DONNELL STARKS
Respondent:
D PARKS WHITE, HARVEY WASSERMAN, EARNEST MONTGOMERY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLAYTON v. GOODMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00418
Defendant:
SERGEANT FLOYD EDWARD, BRANDON GOODMAN, BARBARA CUMMING and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. EDWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00412
Defendant:
CO2 FLOYD EDWARD, EDWARD FLOYD, EDWARD and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. IVERY et al
as 5:2021cv00389
Defendant:
EDWARD FLOYD, DEPUTY WARDEN IVERY, FLOYD EDWARD and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. MITCHELL et al
as 5:2021cv00335
Defendant:
SERGEANT EDWARD FLOYD, CHIEF COUNSELOR MITCHELL, DEPUTY WARDEN IVEY and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. GOODMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
CO2 BRANDON GOODMAN, UNIT MANAGER BARBARA CUMMING, Warden WALTER BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAILEY v. TOBY
as 1:2021cv00113
Petitioner:
Earnest Dailey, Jr and Earnest E. Dailey, Jr.
Respondent:
Annettia Toby
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAILEY v. TOBY
as 5:2021cv00246
Petitioner:
EARNEST DAILEY, JR
Respondent:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spencer v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02117
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Earnest Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
