Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malagoli v. AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company
as 2:2016cv01852
Plaintiff:
Paul John Malagoli
Defendant:
AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , THE OFFICER'S COMMITTEE ON BENEFIT PLANS , SUZANNE TARANTO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
ENG v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2013cv06153
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY ENG
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MEDIFIT CORPORATE SERVICES, INC. v. VANGUARD COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv07664
Plaintiff:
MEDIFIT CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
VANGUARD COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., LISA ENG and ANTHONY PENNACHIO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
EVINER v. YOKETING ENG et al
as 2:2012cv02245
Defendant:
YOKETING ENG, BARRY ENG, TRINH ENG and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA ENG EVINER
Cross Claimant:
The Bank of New York Mellon, incorrectly identified as The Bank of New York/Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KUSMICK v. ARZADI, ESQ. et al
as 2:2010cv02596
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY W. KUSMICK
Defendant:
KARIM ARZADI, ESQ., FISBO OF NEW JERSEY, LLC, WAYLAND ENG and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
FISH et al v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY et al
as 3:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. FISH, RICHARD J. GAUDY, ANGELO M. AGUILERA and others
Defendant:
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN and KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
