Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Emery v. Nooth et al
as 2:2018cv02096
Defendant:
Captain Heehn, R. Young, RN S. Rhodes and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gooding v. Shaffer et al
as 2:2018cv02080
Defendant:
R. Shaffer, S. Martin, T. Blewett and others
Plaintiff:
Damion Paul Gooding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Nelson et al
as 2:2018cv01007
Defendant:
Capt. S. Boston, H.O. J. E. Deacon, A. Eynon and others
Plaintiff:
James Donald Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hentz v. Gruenwald et al
as 2:2018cv00493
Defendant:
A. Eynon, L. Gruenwald, Dr. Hanson and others
Plaintiff:
Leumal Fred Hentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mora-Contreras v. Lindquist et al
as 2:2018cv00388
Defendant:
Troy Bowser, Ann Butte, John and Jane Does 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Mora-Contreras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mora-Contreras v. Wilson et al
as 2:2018cv00390
Defendant:
Troy Bowser, L. Braun, Sierra Deacon and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Mora-Contreras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emery v. Franke et al
as 2:2018cv00257
Defendant:
Noah Berry, Lavelle H. Braun, Ted Chase and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujan v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv01726
Defendant:
Dr. Beamer, Troy Bowser, J. Bugher and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lujan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singh v. Enriquez et al
as 2:2017cv01721
Defendant:
B. Amsberry, C. Babcock, H. Enriquez and others
Plaintiff:
Rotish V. Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. Myrick et al
as 2:2016cv02345
Defendant:
Mr. L. Braun, Ms Eynon, Steve Franke and others
Plaintiff:
Jason W. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
